Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SayItWithWookies's avatar

For some reason years ago I'd gotten it into my head that Jesus Christ meant "the anointed messiah" and so was meant to be more of a title than his name, so thank you for teaching me something. I do think many of Yeshua's words had been put into his mouth by others well after the fact, whether or not the gospels describe one person or an amalgamation of several people or if he was just made up.

The prophecy about Jerusalem being in a state where no stone would be on top of another stone seems a good candidate for someone after 70 CE to have decided "Yeshua definitely would have foreseen this," and so corrected the story. And the parable about the farm workers hired later in the day getting paid as much as the workers who had been at the farm all day doesn't seem to fit the style of many of his other parables, but addresses issues Paul was dealing with in *his* ministry. Not to mention that Paul called himself an apostle and said his law came straight from Yeshua, though he seems to know nothing of the Yeshua in the gospels. So Yeshua (were he to have existed) was barely cold before people started thinking they could improve on him.

Expand full comment
Moon Cat's avatar

I think you made a valid and very interesting point. But I believe the change is to separate him from his human physicality rather than a mere white supremacy thing. More to separate him from us instead of one of us becoming enlightened and showing the way to everyone as children of the Divine. Then we seek him outside instead of seeking the Divine inside.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts